Punam Kumari Singh & Ors. v. The South India Bank Ltd. & Ors.
…Appellant
…Respondent
Case No: Appeal on Diary No. 1493/2023
Date of Judgement: 04/09/2023
Judges:
Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
For Appellant: Ms Payal S Kaware, Advocate.
For Respondent: Mr Benny Joseph, i/b M/s BJ Law Offices LLP, Advocate.
Download Court Copy CLICK HERE
Facts:
Arguments by the Parties:
The Tribunal observed that the Appellants had negotiated with the borrowers for purchasing the subject property, knowing fully well that it was mortgaged in favor of the Respondent Bank for a debt availed by the borrowers. The Tribunal noted that there was no sale deed executed in favor of the Appellants, and the agreement to sell dated 14.02.2022 was cancelled due to an error. The Tribunal found that the Appellants were admittedly not yet the owners in possession of the subject property, and even if they were given possession by the borrowers and expended money for improvement, their remedy against the borrowers would lie before a civil court of competent jurisdiction and not before the D.R.T. The Tribunal prima facie found no defect in the impugned order of the D.R.T. which was challenged in this appeal.
Cases Cited: Sections and Laws Referred: Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act)
Indian Contract Act Indian Penal Code Limitation Act