- 22 Dec, 2023
- 0 Comments
- 1 Min Read
BRANCH MANAGER, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD. & ANR. V. KUSUM TIWARI & ANR.
Branch Manager, District Co-Operative Central Bank Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Kusum Tiwari & Anr.
1. BRANCH MANAGER, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD. & ANR
BRANCH DEVRI, TEHSIL DONDILOHARA,
DISTRICT- BALOD CHHATTISGARH
BALOD, CHHATTISGARH ………..Appellants(s)
Versus
1. KUSUM TIWARI W/O. LT. SHRI GANGA RATTAN
TIWARI & ANR
R/O. VILLAGE KOLIYARA, P.O. PINKAPAR PS DEVRI,
TEHSIL DONDILOHARA DISTRICT-BALOD
CHHATTISGARH
BALOD CHHATTISGARH ………..Respondent(s)
Case No. : MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 423 OF 2023
Date of Judgement : 04 December 2023
Judges : HON’BLE MR. SUBHASH CHANDRA,PRESIDING MEMBER
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIPAHLUWALIA,MEMBER
FOR THE APPELLANT : NEMO
FOR THE RESPONDENT : NEMO
Facts
- Case is a Miscellaneous Application no. 423 of 2023 in Revision Petition (RP) no. 2102/2017
- Original parties are Branch Manager, District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd & Anr (Appellants) versus Kusum Tiwari & Anr (Respondents)
- The revision petition had been dismissed on 4th May, 2023 as the petitioner had not been appearing since 6th October 2021 and no short synopsis was filed
- On 4th December 2023, the matter was called again but none of the parties appeared
Court’s Opinions
- Since the revision petition had already been dismissed and petitioner is not appearing despite multiple chances, it shows the petitioner is not serious about pursuing the case
- The Miscellaneous Application seeking restoration is therefore dismissed
Sections No specific sections are mentioned
Referred Laws No specific laws are referred
The court dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking restoration of the Revision Petition since the petitioner did not appear on multiple hearing dates demonstrating lack of intent to seriously pursue the case
Download Court Copy : https://dreamlaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/task-14-nitishu.pdf
Full text of Judgement :
None appears on behalf of the parties.
This revision petition had been dismissed on 04.05.2023 as the petitioner had not been appearing since 06.10.2021 and no short synopsis had also been filed. Today when the matter was called none appears on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the fact that the petitioner has chosen not to be present to argue its own restoration petition, it is evident that the petitioner is not serious about pursuing this revision petition.
The Miscellaneous Application no. 423 of 2023 is therefore, dismissed.
—END—
